Review: The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton

The House of Mirth is not a perfect novel. There are numerous over-explained paragraphs in the book where Wharton repeats the same point numerous times but using different words, something which is not seen in her later books. Another problem is that, frankly, Lily Bart is not a sympathetic character and only becomes so towards the very end of the story, at a point when she is converted into something truly pitiful and imperfect. It is indeed hard to warm up to the main heroine for a greater part of the book, as Wharton undoubtedly intended her readers to do.

💎 Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence, which was published some fifteen years after The House of Mirth, is a more delicate, gentler and more focused novel with much more sympathetic main characters at its centre who have only the society and their social circumstances to blame for their personal tragedies and the failure to realise their most intimate and deepest desires. In contrast, The House of Mirth has bolder contours, over-explained passages and more direct messages. But where it lacks in subtlety, it makes up for in the sheer drama, with its characters moulded to near-perfection. Moreover, it probably has one of the most powerful endings in fiction.

17 thoughts on “Review: The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton

  1. I’ve read this novel several times, it’s not one of Wharton’s best but it really lingers in your mind after reading it. I agree that Lily is not a likeable character but you feel more sympathetic towards her as the story goes on. Wharton does put a lot of the blame on Lily’s upbringing but also the double standards of society. Have you seen the film?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No, I haven’t. I probably should. Somehow I don’t see Gillian Anderson as Lily Bart at all, maybe I am wrong. As with The Age of Innocence film, it appears to me that some characters in the film are caricatures, overblown and exaggerated counterparts of their respective book characters. Gillian Anderson appears to me that way here and Michelle Pfeiffer as Countess Olenska in The Age of Innocence appears to me that way also (and The Portrait of a Lady film really deserves a special prize for this).

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I thought the film was well done, Gillian Anderson is actually quite suited to the role I think. Characters in films are always going to be less subtle than their book counterparts. I have only seen The Age of Innocence once but I don’t remember being especially keen on it. I think I prefer the characters in The House of Mirth to those in The Age of Innocence.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I haven’t read the novel you mention in the end, nor “The House of Mirth”, but it seems to me that I would enjoy Lily’s character more. The ones who are victims of the society’s cruelty are very common, there stories are simply sad and provoke compassion, but since Lily is a victim of her own desires and inherited habits, she is much more interesting to me. While trying to stay herself when she has nothing, she becomes a tragic character of sort, slightly comic I might say, but still tragic.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I hadn’t paid much attention to this book before, although it has often passed my eyeline, but after reading Irene Nemirovsky’s Jezabel, I think I would love to pick this up and explore more.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment