Review: Hunger by Knut Hamsun

Hunger Cover Hunger [1890/1996] – ★★★★★

Knut Hamsun is a Nobel Prize Winner for Literature whose existentialist literary work Hunger predates Franz Kafka’s The Trial [1925] and Albert Camus’ The Stranger [1942]. Translated from the Norwegian by Sverre Lyngstad, Hunger explores the daily life of one lonely and desperate man on the brink of starvation in a large city. Our unnamed narrator is a freelance writer who has one “ambition” in his life: not to die from hunger. He is hard-working and not demanding, with food and shelter being his main wishes. Hamsun explores mental and physical traumas of the character in a masterful work that inspired some of the greatest philosophical fiction authors of the twentieth century, emphasising in his work that the fight to survive in a big city may take a shape of complete absurdity.

In Hunger, we follow one unnamed narrator who goes about his daily business in Kristiania (Oslo), Norway. He walks the city, drafting articles in parks, hoping for them to be published so that he would have money to buy food and pay his rent, which is always overdue. His life is lived hourly, if not minutely, since he always has to worry whether he would eat at all during the day. The unnamed narrator also meets people on his rounds around the town, who sometimes help him, but many do not. Deeply philosophical, the book by Hamsun is very thought-provoking since we follow every thought and feeling of the increasingly desperate narrator as his mood changes from being hopeful to being hopeless numerous times throughout the day. We also get to view the city of Kristiania and its society through his eyes, and the picture that emerges is relatively bleak, even though our narrator is often upbeat and optimistic.

Hunger is almost another character in the novel and it is referenced many times. This is more than understandable since hunger is never far from our narrator’s immediate thoughts and it is his main worry. “If only one had a bite to eat on such a clear day!” [Hamsun/ Lyngstad, 1890/1996: 6], cries our narrator in despair. Some may find the narrative slightly repetitive, but that is exactly the point of the book – the narrator is trapped in a vicious circle of want, and physical and mental discomfort, and, there should be this feeling that no repetition of that will be enough to drive the message home.

It is easy now to compare Hamsun’s Hunger to the works of Kafka or Camus, but, at least narratively, that comparison is not altogether kind. Unlike Camus’ The Stranger, there is no evident sin or evil committed on the part of the main character in Hunger. Also, unlike Kafka’s The Trial, the perspective in Hunger is that of a narrator, his thoughts and feelings, his unique mental process. Hunger is best compared to the work of Fyodor Dostoyevsky, which came before Hunger, such as Dostoyevsky’s Notes from the Underground [1864] and The Idiot [1868] (see also my list of “10 “Must-Read” Existentialist Novels with Memorable Lines”). Like the main character in Dostoyevsky’s The Idiot, the unnamed narrator in Hunger sometimes displays very childish and naïve behaviour, especially when confronted with the blows and meanness of a cynical, busy city, where everyone wants to make money and charity is far from one’s mind. Also, like in Dostoyevskys work, the narrator in Hunger often appeals to God and feels his presence/absence.  

Like Meursault in The Stranger, the narrator in Hunger at times refuses to pretend or be someone who he is not, even for the purpose to save his own skin. Hamsun’s narrator has his own innate principles and beliefs, his own identity and a moral compass, and he does not want to do anything that would comprise his inner self or his life principles. The narrator says at some point: “the consciousness of being honest went to my head, filling me with the glorious sensation that I was a man of character, a white beacon in the midst of a turbid human sea with floating wreckage everywhere” [Hamsun/ Lyngstad, 1890/1996: 47]. That may be his biggest “failing” since the society is the one that cares about appearances and “small lies” that often do lead to greater benefits. Our narrator is sometimes impulsive and random in his behaviour and will tell “small lies” to confuse someone or to get someone’s attention, but his “fault” and pitiful financial circumstances also start when he is so painfully honest with people that matter. That honesty also results in his romantic and financial undoing.

Like in later novels of Franz Kafka, the society, as portrayed in Hunger, does not desire to help the main character to succeed. If the narrator in Hunger does have his little triumphs, this is down to luck alone. “Luck often followed such a strangely winding path” [Hamsun/ Lyngstad, 1890/1996: 47], says the narrator. Like in the works of Kafka, the society and the whole universe are silent and unrelenting. Societal structures and barriers are there to cripple the human spirit, as well as all the moral principles and individual beliefs regarding justice, leading to absurd situations. Hamsun’s narrator is willing to work, to succeed; he is not lazy. He is clutching at straws to keep himself fed and have a roof over his head, while grappling with the meaning of his own existence (“what if I myself were to be dissolved into darkness, made one with it?” [Hamsun/ Lyngstad, 1890/1996: 72]). However, his attempts often result in absurd and comic situations which would have been funny if they were not also so very sad. The narrator becomes obsessed with trivialities and exhausted by his own attempts to put things right. As the plot progresses, our narrator gets more and more desperate, and comes close to betraying his own inner principles and beliefs to have a piece of bread in his mouth. It is as though the author would like to demonstrate the limits to which a human being may be pushed before he would agree to say goodbye to his pride, moral principles, his very essence and inner belief to physically survive. The result is that one either dies “spiritually” or physically – you cannot choose both, the book implies.

Knut Hamsun’s Hunger is one of the most important existentialist books to come out in the nineteenth century, which paved the way for other equally important literary achievements of the twentieth century. The plot in Hunger is simple, but powerful, detailing one man’s struggle to make way in life in spite of all the absurdities and hardships, while retaining his beliefs, individuality, and remaining faithful to his principles.

21 thoughts on “Review: Hunger by Knut Hamsun

  1. It’s a powerful book. I read it when I saw its theatre version. It was a tremendous play, one that brought you closer to experience the life of people who suffer from having a hunger.
    My thoughts about it are in a billet on my blog if you want.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. You’re getting through the books this week! I never sure how much to read of reviews as I don’t like to know too much. If I read the book, I’d prefer to read the book, then compare experiences. Your rating at the top are a good idea…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I always try not to give too much away in my reviews, so I hardly mentioned any plot in my review. I talked about general ideas of the novel, comparing them with those in similar books. Thanks for stopping by! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  3. thanks for the great review. This is weird, I know I read and like a book by him in French a few decades ago. Of course I don’t remember anything about it, and when I look at the list of his titles in French, nothing rings a bell!! I should try this one

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Even though I normally do not read existentialist books, I think I will add this one to my TBR. Hunger is not something I have to worry about since there is always food in the fridge or pantry and if not there’s a grocery store a few minutes away, so to be able to experience the thoughts and actions of someone who is starving (even though fictional) is like you said powerful.

    Karalee
    Tales of Belle

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Diana – I was introduced to Hamsun a long time ago through his novel “Growth of the Soil,” which I purchased in a cheap edition (English translation) with nice big print in a second hand bookstore. I couldn’t put it down. The novel had an epic quality about it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for this recommendation! It actually so happens that only yesterday I bought to read “Mysteries” by Knut Hamsun and now I think maybe I should have bought “Growth of the Soil” instead 🙂 Especially that I now see that this book secured him a Nobel Prize. It seems that Hamsun wrote a number of truly great books so I am spoilt for choice after reading “Hunger”.

      Like

      1. Diana – I have made some attempts (just a little) to read other Hamsun works, and I have a book of essays and stories by him (not read by me yet) from his time as a young man in America (which comes into play as background for “Growth of the Soil,” which is partly autobiographical, I believe). My impression is that there is a sort of pscyhological or “modernistic” slant in many of his works, perhaps Dostoyevkyi-an, or prefiguring Kafka, Camus, etc., but “Growth of the Soil” is very much a realistic work of fiction, not “far out” in any sense.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s