I spotted this meme at Kath Reads (it was created by The Broke and the Bookish), and decided to also post my answers to it. We may be avoiding reading certain books on our TBR lists for a variety of (rational and not-so-rational) reasons. We may feel that we simply must be in the right mood for certain books or have enough time in our planners to finish really heavy tomes. Below are ten books from my TBR list which I have been avoiding reading because (i) they are too big and/or complex; or (ii) I receive conflicting messages whether I would love them; or (iii) I want to love them, but I am afraid I will not (for example, because I loved an author’s previous work), etc.
I. 2666 [2004] by Roberto Bolaño
The sheer size and complexity of 2666 mean that I keep avoiding reading it. Bolaño’s last book is 1126 pages’ long, and its themes are manifold. It talks about ongoing murders of women in one violent city, but also touches upon the World War II, mental illness, journalism and the breakdown of relationships and careers, among other themes – a monumental work, in many respects.
II. The White Castle [1985] by Orhan Pamuk
I have been meaning to read Pamuk’s books for ages. This Turkish novelist is also the winner of the Nobel Prize, and his book The White Castle is about an Italian scholar who is taken prisoner in Constantinople. I guess I have to be in the right mood to open my mind to Pamuk’s writing style, language and story.
III. Machines Like Me [2019] by Ian McEwan
I admire the writings of Ian McEwan, and it will be interesting to explore the reach of new technological advances (artificial intelligence (AI)) in his latest book. However, I also feel like I “know” this book without reading it. In this book, an AI robot supposedly gets between two people in one alternative London. One of these days I will pick up and read this book.
IV. The Penelopiad [2005] by Margaret Atwood
I loved Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale [1985] and because I also enjoy reading on Greek mythology, The Penelopiad seems like a perfect read for me. I especially like the sound of a tale where we get to know the perspective of Penelope and the twelve doomed maids. It is possible that The Penelopiad keeps sitting on my shelf unread because I feel it will not live up to the high standard I set for Atwood, especially taking into account her other books.
V. Wilder Girls [2019] by Rory Power
I am not a big YA reader, but the premise of this book has been fascinating me for months. Wilder Girls has been compared to Lord of the Flies [1954], and I love the theme of girly friendship, as well as the sound of dark, dystopian twists. As things stand right now, I am still undecided whether to go ahead with this book. In these past months, Wilder Girls has been in and out of my TBR list more times than any other book in the history of my TBR (and all the hype surrounding this book only makes my final decision harder to make!). I guess the simplest solution will be to just sit down and start finally reading it.
VI. Jude the Obscure [1895] by Thomas Hardy
I love Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the d’Urbervilles [1891] and Far from the Madding Crowd [1874], but feel that Jude the Obscure may disappoint me in some way. That is probably the main reason I keep postponing reading it. The goodreads synopsis reads that this book is about “Jude Fawley…who is trapped into marrying Arabella, who later abandons him…He then moves to another town and “falls in love with his cousin Sue Bridehead, a sensitive, freethinking “New Woman“.
VII. The Master of Go [1951] by Yasunari Kawabata
I must admit I have a slightly difficult, strange relationship with Kawabata. I cannot say I appreciated fully Snow Country [1948] or Beauty and Sadness [1964], but I did find many things to love in The Sound of the Mountain [1954]. His reader needs to be able to discern subtlety in the “economic” writing, as well as maybe accord meaning to simple things that the author describes (plenty of symbolic interpretations and lots of “leaps of faith”). That is probably why I am still avoiding reading The Master of Go. It also sounds like a different book from his usual ones, though he does touch there on some familiar themes of older vs. younger generation, and tradition vs. modern progress.
VIII. 1Q84 [2009] by Haruki Murakami
This dystopian novel is actually composed of three books and counts 925 pages. This alone would not have put me off the book had I not also heard that the beginning (roughly 300 pages) is very “slow”. I want to read 1Q84, but the size, as well as the fact that it is Murakami, means I keep avoiding reading it.
IX. The Rehearsal [2008] by Eleanor Catton
The truth is that I am a fan of Catton’s Man Booker Prize winner The Luminaries [2013] and that is probably why I keep avoiding reading her debut The Rehearsal, even though I am very curious about her writing style there. Perhaps I am rightly thinking it will not be as good as her second book. The Rehearsal concerns girls at a boarding school who find out that one of their friends had an affair with a teacher.
X. American Gods [2001] by Neil Gaiman
I know Gaiman has a lot of fans, and only to think of the number of times I kept moving his books in and out of my TBR list! At first, I wanted to read Gaiman’s The Ocean at the End of the Lane [2013], but then I switched to American Gods. I think American Gods would now finally settle how I feel about the author. Of course, the problem now is to start reading it. I realised I would need to be in the right mood for this book (not to mention that it is 635 pages’ long). I also fear that Gaiman would end up for me what Stephen King has become – an “over-hyped” author.
Have you read or planning to read any of the above books? What books you avoid reading are on your TBR?
I have read three on your list, American Gods, IQ84, and Jude the Obscure. I feel all of them were time well spent with their stories. I am not an Atwood fan, and 2666 scares me with its sheer bulk.
I have been avoiding the book, Lolita for years. Maybe someday!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks very much for your feedback on American Gods, 1Q84 and Jude! I have read Lolita, but some years ago, and I remember liking it (though, of course, “like” is not probably the word many people would want to use when describing their experience with this book – given the nature of the plot -heh). I feel I need to re-read it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love American Gods, and feel like it’s an easy read. You could watch the first season of the tv show, to get a taste!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is so good to know it is an easy read! I will look up that TV show, thanks!
LikeLike
What a great idea! I love lists like this that force me to consider what/why/how I read what I do and avoid reading other things. I have the same edition of 1Q84 on my TBR shelf and am also interested in the premise of Wilder Girls. Read on!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I keep wanting to read Gaiman as well, but haven’t. I feel like he will be too fantasy-ish for my taste.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is also my reason for not picking up his books sooner. Unlike some others, I did not first read his children’s books, so I cannot “transition” the way they do to his adult book versions. Gaiman is also “everywhere” and gives me “Stephen King” vibes. Perhaps, there is some kind of pressure to love him and his books because so many people simply do.
LikeLiked by 2 people
See… I refuse to read a book because its author is popular. I’ll only read a book if it appeals to me, and I don’t care who the author is. So far, nothing by Gaiman or King have ever made me say “oh, that sounds like something I’d enjoy” so I’ve never read either of them. I’m sure they’re find writers, though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah… Jude the Obscure. I was given a copy of that by someone many years ago. I tried to read it but… I kinda gave up on it pretty early. Hm… Don’t beat yourself for avoiding it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the opinion! Yes, I did read some mixed reviews on Jude the Obscure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As for the Atwood, that one doesn’t appeal to me at all. But I just finished reading her short stories “Stone Mattress” and they’re wonderful. Also her “Hag-Seed” is amazing (which is technically a re-telling of Shakespeare’s The Tempest, but yet it isn’t – its brilliant). I also liked her “The Heart Goes Last” another dystopian novel, but with a whole lot of humor. Her “Alias Grace” was fascinating, but heavy going.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks very much for these recommendations. I have to check out Atwood’s short stories. I have just now read the synopsis to The Heart Goes Last, and it sounds like an interesting book too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought it was great, especially because with the dystopian background, she also added so much humor!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked the concept of Machines Like Me, but I borrowed from the library and found the opening paragraphs were dense without dialogue and I just knew I wouldn’t get on with this book.
I have read Jude the Obscure but it’s so tragic (even more so than his other works) that I don’t think I’d re-read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is always something that stops me from reading Machines Like Me, and if it has dense text, it will probably also not be for me. I want to believe I am prepared for the tragic in Hardy’s novels, and I hope it will not be anything worse than Tess. And, yes, I agree, they are not the books one would want to re-read. I only re-read Far From the Madding Crowd.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My most read Hardy would be Tess – I studied it at college and then my husband bought the book for me a few years later, and I’ve read it maybe twice since then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read 2666 when it came out. Wasn’t a big fan of it back then. Still have my copy so might give it a re-read one day as I have a better understanding of some of the topics in the book now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a fun post! I’ve only read McEwan but haven’t looked into any of his other books. I’ve never read Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale is one I’ve been meaning to read among with Tess. I am avoiding a couple long, Vanity Fair and A Fine Balance because I need to clear up a few of my current reads
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! McEwan can be great. Atonement and The Children Act are probably the ones that I loved the most from his work. I would love to know your view on The Handmaid’s Tale and Tess. I have not read A Fine Balance, but have read Vanity Fair, which I enjoyed quite a bit. Another big book I want to read is The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have that book too! Diana you always have some of the best reviews, would you consider a conversation / discussion post on A Fine Balance or The Poisonwood Bible in the future? Both are on my TBR for some future time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, definitely, thank you! I am especially interested in a discussion/conversation post on The Poisonwood Bible!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jude the Obscure is my least favourite Hardy (and I’m not a Hardy fan!) I found it hilariously sentimental. I do love Far From The Massing Crowd, though.
Machines Like Me is indeed very predictable, but it is a quick read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Madding Crowd! Autocorrect!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Before Machines Like Me came out, I was really keen to read it based on the promise (and also, I am quite fascinated by AI), but after I read some reviews, I don’t think it is for me. I like Gaiman, but haven’t read American Gods. The Ocean at the End of the Lane and Neverwhere are my favourites.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am reading American Gods right now, I am enjoying it, but I wish I had more time to dedicate to it so I would read it faster. All the other books on this list sound very interesting, thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for reading! That’s great to hear that American Gods is a good and enjoyable read. I have to say I felt a little apprehensive picking it up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was too, but I am now at the 50% mark and I am flying through it more so now then I was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
American Gods is quintessential Gaiman — if you don’t get into it after a few chapters, then you can probably dismiss him as an author from your list. Personally I don’t think he’s over-hyped, he is a smart writer and a good craftsman, but he’s not for all tastes.
Jude the Obscure is the only major Hardy novel I have not read. I’ve been lagging because it’s described as the most depressing of them all, but I should really try it for myself.
I have a mixed relationship with Margaret Atwood. Some of her novels I have absolutely loved but the “literary experiments” — The Penelopiad and also Hag-Seed — left me cold. She is so extremely clever but in these short format works the cleverness was too much to the fore for me. However, because they are short it’s easy enough to give it a go and see what you think. Certainly they are highly readable.
Fun topic, thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your thoughts! I will keep that in mind when reading Gaiman, though I am not hugely impressed now that I read the first page. I still want to give The Penelopiad a go. I realise it is experimental. At least, her cleverness, as you say, and writing style will shine through even if I won’t like all of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you have to read a bit more of American Gods to see if the storytelling will draw you in. I look forward to finding out whether it does!
LikeLiked by 1 person
American Gods is very polarizing among the Gaiman fans I know. People either really like it or don’t like it at all, even if they like his other work. I don’t know why it’s so polarizing.
I’ve recently been avoiding Into the Wild. I want to read it, but haven’t been in the right headspace.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s interesting. I guess the fact that the book is huge also contributes to it having a mixed reception. I remember enjoying Into the Wild and the movie also left an impression on me. You are right when you say one has to be in the mood for these kinds of books.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read 2666 several years ago and, in the end, felt it was worth it but it definitely wasn’t an easy read. I recently gave up on Bolano’s The Savage Detectives, which had sat on my TBR since finishing 2666 though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am glad to hear that 2666 is a worthwhile read because it looks like a huge investment in terms of time, effort, etc. I know about The Savage Detectives – I thought about reading it instead of 2666, but opted for 2666 in the end as “the representation of Bolano’s work”. Thanks for your opinion, I won’t probably read The Savage Detectives now especially since I see its character list is endless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
2666 seemed like it had more depth though, admittedly, I didn’t make it past the first section of The Savage Detectives. There are a lot of characters!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a great idea for a post, I’m definitely going to steal this! Machines Like Me, Jude the Obscure, and 1Q84 will probably also be on my list. I loved Murakami when I was younger but I doubt I would enjoy him nearly as much now, and coupled with the length, 1Q84 seriously intimidates me. But I do want to read it… dilemmas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you and I am curious to see your answers too! I feel the same way about Murakami. I did not read him when I was younger, but the work that I read by him my younger self would have enjoyed much more 🙂 Let’s hope 1Q84 will prove to be a good read for us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have only read one book on the list, Bolano’s 2666. It is in my opinion the best novel written this century, though admittedly it is grueling, especially the Part about the Crimes, just relentless. The Savage Detectives is brilliant as well in my opinion. I haven’t read an Ian McEwan novel since The Comfort of Strangers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am looking forward to Bolano’s 2666. Actually, since I made this list, I have read Pamuk’s The White Castle (it is very short!), and I now think you may enjoy it too. It is thought-provoking, subtle and concerns the concept of identity (confusion). There is a theme of a doppelgänger there. I also want to thank you for recommending that I read Knut Hamsun’s Mysteries, which I enjoyed (reviewed also), and I have now checked out to read Hamsun’s Pan, which I cannot wait to get into.
LikeLiked by 1 person
2666 is dense and hermetic. I am a big fan of Boland, though I haven’t read all his books, as there has been a deluge of posthumous publications, some of which just seem like cashing in as they seem unfinished or just vague ideas or first drafts. If you are looking for an introduction Distant Star is brilliant, short, chilling and disturbing. I will have to read your review of Mysteries I am glad you liked it. I only occasionally visit WordPress these days as I have stopped writing but when I do I will check it out. I will also take a look at The White Castle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lot of this are on my TBR too, and I agree that 2666 seems scary long. As for 1Q84, it is long but I found it quite readable (and amazing). Also, I really liked the beginning, never thought of it as slow 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the encouragement on 1Q84! 🙂
LikeLike
I have 1Q84 and the The Penelopiad on my shelf and keep putting these off too. It may be the less than stellar reviews I read about both that put me off a bit, they are there though waiting to be read!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha! Avoiding books on the TBR shelf. 🙂
(I do too. As I am rearranging my library, I will save a few shelves for TBR. Bolaños? It’s there. My wife and daughters loved it. A bit long. I will “do” War and peace” first.
The master of Go is typical Kawabata. Liked it.
Murakami… Read two, fell short of my expectations.
Have a nice reading week-end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I bet Bolaño will impress me – I am really looking forward to it, and also want to read very much his Distant Star, Amulet and Night in Chile. I read War & Peace, and I highly recommend it. I need to re-read it, too but until I locate a Russian-language version I cannot because I think it is better to read it in my native language. I am glad you liked The Master of Go. I am warming to Kawabata slowly and I hope I will “get” and appreciate him more one day. Murakami’s more recent novels also failed to impress me.
Thank you, and have a very nice week-end, too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, definitely read it in Russian. I always read the authors in the original language if I speak it. García Marquez I can only read in Spanish. Tolstoï and all the Russians? I stick to French. 😉
Murakami has intriguing stories but he seems to end up “à la French”. No ending. Just read Modiano, our last Nobel Prize. No story, no beginning, no ending. Waste of time really. (Sorry to be harsh bit recent French authors I can’t catch up with…)
KAwabata is worth the read again. Beauty and sadness is quite hard, but a good book.
Cheers
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now that I think about it I think it is better to read Russian novels in a French than in English translation. Modiano is an author I am still to read, so I will bear in mind your warning. My Kawabata next read will be The Old Capital, and, you are right, I remember I did find “Beauty and Sadness” hard-going.
As for Spanish, I love to read novels in Spanish (my reading Spanish is much better than my speaking). In the past, I read English classics translated to Spanish, but now I like reading in Spanish Latin American authors. My recent “discovery” is the novellas of Adolfo Bioy Casares and I kind of liked recently “Los que aman, odian” and “La invención de Morel”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bioy Casares? Will look him up. Buen fin de semana. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Admittedly Wilder Girls was a very divisive books that readers loved or hated but if you check out my review and author q and a I absolutely raves about it before publication and continue to do so. I can’t wait to read Power’s next book, coming out this summer. I would say to absolutely read it but again it is definitely a love or hate book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did not even know that Power’s next book is coming out next summer, thanks for this tip! And, I think you are absolutely right about Wilder Girls being a love/hate book – I see that most people are either enamoured or totally repelled.
LikeLike
1Q84 remains my favorite by Murakami. I would not consider it slow. Each chapter concerns alternatively a young man and a young girl. At the end of each short chapter, there’s a sentence making you want to know what happens next to him or her. But then you have to read the chapter on the other person before you know. And same thing happens at the end of each chapter. So I found it actually suspenseful, and the chapters are short. This is actually a book I could have kept reading for a few more hundred pages without any problem. I was actually mad at the translator when I read somewhere that he cut out passages!! If only I could read Japanese!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will have that in mind when reading 1Q84, thanks very much for your view. I don’t even know where I have heard that the book is slow. I am intrigued that each chapter ends on a suspenseful note. Everything tells me that I will love 1Q84.
LikeLike